Galerie d'images
Toutes les images de la base — taxons, formations et intervalles géologiques.
⚠ La fonctionnalité de récupération des images est en cours de test, des images non pertinentes peuvent apparaître.
4,186 image(s)
Saltasaurus (which means "lizard from Salta") was a sauropod dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous Period. Relatively small among sauropods, though still massive by human standards, it was characterized by a diplodocid-like head
Saltasaurus (which means "lizard from Salta") was a sauropod dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous Period. Relatively small among sauropods, though still massive by human standards, it was characterized by a diplodocid-like head
Map of the localities in the Bauru Basin where the sauropod dinosaurs were collected.
(A) A phylogenetic principal-component analysis (PCA) represents the projection of the Dinosauria supertree (STAR Methods) into a PCA of climatic variables. PC1 axis shows strong positive correlation with maximum temperature ([temp max), low positive correlation with precipitation seasonality ( precip season), strong negative correlation with minimum temperature (Ytemp min), and strong negative correlation with minimum precipitation (Yprecip min). PC2 axis shows strong positive correlation with minimum temperature ([temp min) and negative correlation with precipitation seasonality (Yprecip season). Shadows around points highlight the relative density in the principal compo- nent space of non-dinosaurian Dinosauromorpha (gray), Ornithischia (blue), Sauropodomorpha (green), and Theropoda (red). (B) Lower left plot shows 95% confidence interval convex hulls for each dinosauromorph subclade. Blue thermometer (top left corner) symbolizes the direction of the vector in the PC space region for cold temper- atures; yellow thermometer (top right corner) indicates the direction of the vector in PC space for warm tem- peratures; brown shrub (top right corner) depicts dry conditions, while the same with a gray, rainy cloud (mid, lower side of the graph) illustrates seasonal conditions. Silhouettes represent the following taxa (clockwise from the higher left corner): Minmi, Edmontosaurus, Pachyrhinosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Asilisaurus, Graci- liceratops, Harpymimus, Altirhinus, Gobititan, Suz- housaurus, Marasuchus, Pampadromaeus, Herrer- asaurus, Vulcanodon, Diplodocus, Giraffatitan, Coelophysis, Dromomeron, Gondwanatitan, Tapuiasaurus, Anchisaurus, Siamotyrannus, Diodorus, Suchomimus, Phuwiangosaurus, Ouranosaurus, Irritator, Tangvayosaurus, Nanshiungosaurus, Aeolosaurus, Rebbachisaurus, Chuxiongosaurus, Tethyshadros, Koreanosaurus. Genyodectes, Mapusaurus, Vegavis, Goyocephale, and Rhoetosaurus.
Restoration of the Chinese theropod "Sinopliosaurus fusuiensis" as a generalized spinosaurid. Silhouette of the holotype tooth is visible.
dent de Globidens aegyptiacus et dent de Mosasaurus beaugei montrant les cavités de la dent de remplacement
Henan Geological Museum, Zhengzhou, China. Complete indexed photo collection at WorldHistoryPics.com.
Reconstruction of Mochlodon suessi from the Late Cretaceous of Austria. Based on Zalmoxes by Scott Hartman
Numbers above nodes represent bootstrap values, whereas those beneath nodes represent Bremer decay values. Bootstrap values lower than 20 and Bremer decay values less than 2 are not shown.
Numbers above nodes represent bootstrap values, whereas those beneath nodes represent Bremer decay values. Bootstrap values lower than 20 and Bremer decay values less than 2 are not shown.
Muestras de dinosaurios en tamaño real a cuando existieron. El gran tiranosaurio, que habito hace millones de años la zona de Bagua en Amazonas. El carnotaurus (carnívoro feroz), el velociraptor y el lewisuchus, pequeño antecesor de los dinosaurios.
Ahvaytum bahndooiveche scale comparison using Mbiresaurus raathi as reference from Lovelace et al., 2025
Life restoration of the German Jurassic ichthyosaur Suevoleviathan disinteger. The dorsal and caudal fins are loosely based on those of Stenopterygius. References Maisch, M.W. (2020). "The best-preserved skeleton of Suevoleviathan integer (Bronn, 1844)(Reptilia: Ichthyosauria) from the lower Jurassic of south-western Germany, with a discussion of the genus". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 297 (2): 153–172. Maisch, M.W. (1998). "A new ichthyosaur genus from the Posidonia Shale (Lower Toarcian, Jurassic) of Holzmaden, SW-Germany with comments on the phylogeny of post-Triassic ichthyosaurs". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen 209 (1): 47–78.
Tuarangisaurus cabazai skeleton restoration, Copenhagen
Muraenosaurus? Reedii, Sp. Nov. and Tricleidus? Laramiensis Knight, American Jurassic Plesiosaurs
Photo montage of different specimens of mosasaurs: Opetiosaurus Vallecillosaurus Halisaurus Plotosaurus Platecarpus Tylosaurus
Comparison of the digit III/footprint length ratio for Eubrontes of the same size in America, Europe, and China. American specimens: (a) Eubrontes giganteus AC 15/3, type specimens (Lockley 2009); (b) Eubrontes giganteus AC 45/1 (Olsen et al. 1998); (c) Utah Eubrontes 1 (Lockley et al. 1998); (d) Utah Eubrontes 2 (T3) (Lockley et al. 2021); (e) Connecticut Eubrontes (Ishigaki and Fujisaki 1989); (f) Eubrontes (?) glenrosensis (Adams et al. 2010); European specimen: (g) Eubrontes veillonensis (de Lapparent and Montenat 1967); Chinese specimens: (h) Eubrontes pareschequier (Xing et al. 2009a, 2014b); (i) Eubrontes zigongensis (Xing et al. 2014c); (j) Eubrontes platypus (Hitchcock 1858) Xiyang specimen (Yang and Yang 1987); (k) Eubrontes monax (Zhen et al. 1986; Lockley et al. 2013); (l) Eubrontes xiyangensis (Zhen et al. 1986; Lockley et al. 2013); (m) Changpeipus carbonicus (Xing et al. 2014b); (n) Eubrontes nianpanshanensis (Xing et al. 2016b); (o) Lufengopus dongi (Lü et al. 2006; Xing et al. 2014d); (p) Eubrontes (?) glenrosensis Hailiutu specimen (Li et al. 2010; Xing et al. 2021); (q) Lockleypus luanpingeris (Xing et al. 2018e); (r) Chapus lockleyi (Li et al. 2006); (s) Asianopodus pulvinicalyx (Matsukawa et al. 2005); (t) Asianopodus robustus (Li et al. 2011; Lockley et al. 2018); (u) Eubrontes nobitai (This study); (v) Eubrontes HX-T3 (Xing et al. 2015b); (w) Eubrontes BJA-T4 (Xing et al. 2016c)
Cleveland Museum of Natural History Coelophysis block, originally AMNH Block XII collected in 1948 by Colbert and crew.
Paddle of the British Jurassic pliosaurid plesiosaur Eardasaurus housed at the Oxford University Natural History Museum.
Title: A descriptive catalogue of the marine reptiles of the Oxford clay. Based on the Leeds Collection in the British Museum (Natural History), London .. Identifier: descriptivecatal02brit (find matches) Year: 1910 (1910s) Authors: British Museum (Natural History). Dept. of Geology; Andrews, Charles William, 1866-1924 Subjects: Reptiles, Fossil Publisher: London, Printed by order of the Trustees Contributing Library: Smithsonian Libraries Digitizing Sponsor: Biodiversity Heritage Library View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: CATAL.MARINE KEPT. OXFORD CLAY. PART II. PLATE I. pmcc. Text Appearing After Image: >p77ia:. G.M.Woodward del. etlibh. West, Newman imp. PLIOSAURUS FEROX. Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Main evolutionary steps proposed for the morphofunctional and postural changes of the sauropod pedes. (A) Sauropod body mass through time (in metric tons) based on the sauropod body mass estimations of (41) (NB: data lacking for the second half of the Upper Cretaceous so illustrated here faded, in continuity with the data recorded in the Cretaceous). Schematic outlines of selected large specimens illustrated in the curve, including (from left to right) P. engelhardti, Vulcanodon karibaensis, R. brownei, G. brancai, Cedarosaurus weiskopfae, and Notocolossus gonzalezparejasi. (B) Projected evolutionary changes occurring in the sauropod pes associated with trend in body mass, including 1, skeletal and functional digitigrade pedal posture among basal non-sauropod sauropodomorphs with an incipient soft tissue pad (ISP) (see figs. S34 and S35); 2 and 3, expansion of a well-developed soft tissue pad beneath the elevated pedal bones (SP), resulting in a functionally plantigrade pes + retention of skeletal posture within a range of digitigrady; 4, retention of a soft tissue pad and yet undetermined trend toward more elevated bones; 5, conservation of the neomorphic soft tissue pad within all lineages. Selected examples of well-preserved non-sauropod sauropodomorph and sauropod pedal tracks illustrated above the trends, including (from left to right) Evazoum siriguii; Pseudotetrasauropus bipedoida, Eosauropus isp., Lavinipes cheminii; Kalosauropus pollex, Liujianpus shunan, Polyonyx gomesi; Parabrontopodus mcintoshi; Brontopodus birdi; Titanopodus mendozensis; and unnamed Asian sauropod track. Source of adapted drawing and notes are listed in table S9 and data S2.
Main evolutionary steps proposed for the morphofunctional and postural changes of the sauropod pedes. (A) Sauropod body mass through time (in metric tons) based on the sauropod body mass estimations of (41) (NB: data lacking for the second half of the Upper Cretaceous so illustrated here faded, in continuity with the data recorded in the Cretaceous). Schematic outlines of selected large specimens illustrated in the curve, including (from left to right) P. engelhardti, Vulcanodon karibaensis, R. brownei, G. brancai, Cedarosaurus weiskopfae, and Notocolossus gonzalezparejasi. (B) Projected evolutionary changes occurring in the sauropod pes associated with trend in body mass, including 1, skeletal and functional digitigrade pedal posture among basal non-sauropod sauropodomorphs with an incipient soft tissue pad (ISP) (see figs. S34 and S35); 2 and 3, expansion of a well-developed soft tissue pad beneath the elevated pedal bones (SP), resulting in a functionally plantigrade pes + retention of skeletal posture within a range of digitigrady; 4, retention of a soft tissue pad and yet undetermined trend toward more elevated bones; 5, conservation of the neomorphic soft tissue pad within all lineages. Selected examples of well-preserved non-sauropod sauropodomorph and sauropod pedal tracks illustrated above the trends, including (from left to right) Evazoum siriguii; Pseudotetrasauropus bipedoida, Eosauropus isp., Lavinipes cheminii; Kalosauropus pollex, Liujianpus shunan, Polyonyx gomesi; Parabrontopodus mcintoshi; Brontopodus birdi; Titanopodus mendozensis; and unnamed Asian sauropod track. Source of adapted drawing and notes are listed in table S9 and data S2.
Cast of the holotype trackway of Eosauropus, a probable sauropodomorph dinosaur ichnogenus, on display at the Museum of Western Colorado’s Dinosaur Journey Museum in Fruita, Colorado
Iguanodon bernissartensis ; rechtervoetbeenderen over een voetafdruk (Iguanodontipus burreyi). Door Louis Dollo (1905).
Title: A dictionary of the fossils of Pennsylvania and neighboring states named in the reports and catalogues of the survey .. Identifier: CUbiodiversity600397-9082 (find matches) Year: 1889 (1880s) Authors: Lesley, J. P. (J. Peter), 1819-1903; Pennsylvania. Board of Commissioners for the Second Geological Survey Subjects: Paleontology Publisher: Harrisburg, Board of Commissioners for the Geological Survey Contributing Library: Cornell University Library Digitizing Sponsor: Mann Library, Cornell View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: 697 Plec. Plectropterna angusta, Hitchcock, Icht. Mass. page 110, lias. f-) itch cock ^ Idithuolo^ij McLSS. Text Appearing After Image: I'lfrtroplerria, Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
IdentificatieTitel(s): Pootafdruk en een spoor van een staart. Brontozoum Sillimanium and B. Minisculum (titel op object). Caudal Trail? (titel op object)Objecttype: foto bladzijde Objectnummer: RP-F-2001-7-1066-4Opschriften / Merken: nummer, recto, gedrukt: ‘Plate XVI. Fig. 1. Fig. 2.’Omschrijving: Links de pootafdruk van een Brontozoum Sillimanium en Brontozoum Minisculum, rechts (vermoedelijk) een spoor van de staart van een Platypterna.VervaardigingVervaardiger: fotograaf: J.L. Lovell (vermeld op object)Plaats vervaardiging: AmherstDatering: ca. 1858 - in of voor 1863Materiaal: fotopapier Techniek: albuminedrukAfmetingen: pagina: h 313 mm × b 232 mmOnderwerpWat: foot-print, trackVerwerving en rechtenCredit line: Aankoop met steun van de Mondriaan Stichting, het Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds, het VSBfonds, het Paul Huf Fonds/Rijksmuseum Fonds en het Egbert KunstfondsVerwerving: aankoop 2001Copyright: Publiek domein
A Thescelosaurus at the Burpee Museum of Natural History in Rockford, Illinois, USA. Size:12 feet in length, 3 ft tall at the hip Weight: 670 lbs when alive.
Dorsal vertebra of platecarpus, a cretaceous. Mosasaur from the Niobrara Chalk of Kansas etc. General Collections Keywords: prehistoric archaeology; Paleopathology; Moodie, Roy Lee
Ichthyosaur Skeleton, Platypterygius longmani, in The Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory at Darwin.
A, Akmechetosauropus makhkamovi (redrawn from [56]); B, Amblydactylus gethingi (redrawn from [8]); C, Amblydactylus kortmeyeri (redrawn from [57]); D, Apulosauripus federicianus (redrawn from [62]); E, Babatagosauropus bulini (redrawn from [56]); F, Bonaparteichnium tali (redrawn from [66]); G, Brachyguanodonipus prejanensis (redrawn from [68]); H, Camptosaurichnus fasolae (redrawn from [70]); I, Camptosauropus vialovi (redrawn from [74]); J, Caririchnium magnificum (redrawn from [11]); K, Caririchnium leonardii (redrawn from [76]); L-M, Caririchnium protohadrosaurichnos (redrawn from [78]); N, Caririchnium lotus (redrawn from [81]); O, Caririchnium kyoungsookimi (redrawn from [80]); P, Gigantoshiraminesauropus matsuoi (redrawn from [82]); Q, Gypsichnites pacensis (redrawn from [8]); R, Hadrosaurichnoides igeensis (redrawn from [92]); S, Hadrosaurichnus australis (redrawn from [93]); T, Hadrosaurichnus titicaensis (redrawn from [96]); U, Hadrosauripeda hauboldi (redrawn from [98]); V, Hadrosauropodus langstoni (redrawn from [24]); W, Hadrosauropodus nanxiongensis (redrawn from [99]); X, Iguanodonichnus frenkii (redrawn from [70]); Y, Iguanodonipus cuadrupedae (redrawn from [68]).
A, Akmechetosauropus makhkamovi (redrawn from [56]); B, Amblydactylus gethingi (redrawn from [8]); C, Amblydactylus kortmeyeri (redrawn from [57]); D, Apulosauripus federicianus (redrawn from [62]); E, Babatagosauropus bulini (redrawn from [56]); F, Bonaparteichnium tali (redrawn from [66]); G, Brachyguanodonipus prejanensis (redrawn from [68]); H, Camptosaurichnus fasolae (redrawn from [70]); I, Camptosauropus vialovi (redrawn from [74]); J, Caririchnium magnificum (redrawn from [11]); K, Caririchnium leonardii (redrawn from [76]); L-M, Caririchnium protohadrosaurichnos (redrawn from [78]); N, Caririchnium lotus (redrawn from [81]); O, Caririchnium kyoungsookimi (redrawn from [80]); P, Gigantoshiraminesauropus matsuoi (redrawn from [82]); Q, Gypsichnites pacensis (redrawn from [8]); R, Hadrosaurichnoides igeensis (redrawn from [92]); S, Hadrosaurichnus australis (redrawn from [93]); T, Hadrosaurichnus titicaensis (redrawn from [96]); U, Hadrosauripeda hauboldi (redrawn from [98]); V, Hadrosauropodus langstoni (redrawn from [24]); W, Hadrosauropodus nanxiongensis (redrawn from [99]); X, Iguanodonichnus frenkii (redrawn from [70]); Y, Iguanodonipus cuadrupedae (redrawn from [68]).
A, Akmechetosauropus makhkamovi (redrawn from [56]); B, Amblydactylus gethingi (redrawn from [8]); C, Amblydactylus kortmeyeri (redrawn from [57]); D, Apulosauripus federicianus (redrawn from [62]); E, Babatagosauropus bulini (redrawn from [56]); F, Bonaparteichnium tali (redrawn from [66]); G, Brachyguanodonipus prejanensis (redrawn from [68]); H, Camptosaurichnus fasolae (redrawn from [70]); I, Camptosauropus vialovi (redrawn from [74]); J, Caririchnium magnificum (redrawn from [11]); K, Caririchnium leonardii (redrawn from [76]); L-M, Caririchnium protohadrosaurichnos (redrawn from [78]); N, Caririchnium lotus (redrawn from [81]); O, Caririchnium kyoungsookimi (redrawn from [80]); P, Gigantoshiraminesauropus matsuoi (redrawn from [82]); Q, Gypsichnites pacensis (redrawn from [8]); R, Hadrosaurichnoides igeensis (redrawn from [92]); S, Hadrosaurichnus australis (redrawn from [93]); T, Hadrosaurichnus titicaensis (redrawn from [96]); U, Hadrosauripeda hauboldi (redrawn from [98]); V, Hadrosauropodus langstoni (redrawn from [24]); W, Hadrosauropodus nanxiongensis (redrawn from [99]); X, Iguanodonichnus frenkii (redrawn from [70]); Y, Iguanodonipus cuadrupedae (redrawn from [68]).
A, Akmechetosauropus makhkamovi (redrawn from [56]); B, Amblydactylus gethingi (redrawn from [8]); C, Amblydactylus kortmeyeri (redrawn from [57]); D, Apulosauripus federicianus (redrawn from [62]); E, Babatagosauropus bulini (redrawn from [56]); F, Bonaparteichnium tali (redrawn from [66]); G, Brachyguanodonipus prejanensis (redrawn from [68]); H, Camptosaurichnus fasolae (redrawn from [70]); I, Camptosauropus vialovi (redrawn from [74]); J, Caririchnium magnificum (redrawn from [11]); K, Caririchnium leonardii (redrawn from [76]); L-M, Caririchnium protohadrosaurichnos (redrawn from [78]); N, Caririchnium lotus (redrawn from [81]); O, Caririchnium kyoungsookimi (redrawn from [80]); P, Gigantoshiraminesauropus matsuoi (redrawn from [82]); Q, Gypsichnites pacensis (redrawn from [8]); R, Hadrosaurichnoides igeensis (redrawn from [92]); S, Hadrosaurichnus australis (redrawn from [93]); T, Hadrosaurichnus titicaensis (redrawn from [96]); U, Hadrosauripeda hauboldi (redrawn from [98]); V, Hadrosauropodus langstoni (redrawn from [24]); W, Hadrosauropodus nanxiongensis (redrawn from [99]); X, Iguanodonichnus frenkii (redrawn from [70]); Y, Iguanodonipus cuadrupedae (redrawn from [68]).
Heterodontosaurus tucki life restoration. Integument based on the related Tianyulong, proportions based on photos of specimen SAM-PK-K1332 and skeletal reconstruction by Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 240).
Life restoration of Diodorus scytobrachion. Based on the holotype remains[1] and those of more complete relatives.[2][3] External look based on inferences for basal dinosauromorphs[4] and the mythical mušḫuššu.
Life restoration of the mosasaurine mosasaurid Eremiasaurus, with unknown portions and soft tissues based primarily on Prognathodon and supplemented with Mosasaurus where needed. References Leblanc, A.R.H.; Caldwell, M.W.; Bardet, N. (2012). "A new mosasaurine from the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) phosphates of Morocco and its implications for mosasaurine systematics". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32 (1): 82–104. Lindgren, J.; Kaddumi, H.; Polcyn, M. (2013). "Soft tissue preservation in a fossil marine lizard with a bilobed tail fin". Nature Communications 4: 2423. DOI:10.1038/ncomms3423. Konishi, T.; Brinkman, D.; Massare, J.A.; Caldwell, M.W. (2011). "New exceptional specimens of Prognathodon overtoni (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the upper Campanian of Alberta, Canada, and the systematics and ecology of the genus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31 (5): 1026–1046. Russell, D.A. (1967). "Systematics and morphology of American mosasaurs". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 23: 1–241.
Attenborosaurus conybeari, a plesiosaur from the Early Jurassic of England, pencil drawing
Attenborosaurus conybeari, a plesiosaur from the Early Jurassic of England, pencil drawing
Attenborosaurus conybeari, a plesiosaur from the Early Jurassic of England, pencil drawing
Simple drawing of Ankylosaurus magniventris, a North American Cretaceous ankylosaurid. Based on skeletal reconstruction in Paul 2010.
Depiction of dietary niche partitioning among megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the DPF (MAZ-2). Left to right: Chasmosaurus belli, Lambeosaurus lambei, Styracosaurus albertensis, Scolosaurus cutleri (formerly sunk in Euoplocephalus tutus), Prosaurolophus maximus, Panoplosaurus mirus. A herd of S. albertensis looms in the background.
Californosaurus perrini, an ichthyosaur from the Late Triassic of North America, pencil drawing
Californosaurus perrini, an ichthyosaur from the Late Triassic of North America, pencil drawing
Californosaurus perrini, an ichthyosaur from the Late Triassic of North America, pencil drawing
Appears to be an albino Elk, located at Wagon Trails Animal Park.
Bakonydraco galaczi modified to be a tapejarid, from azhdarchid original.
Pleuroceras solare, Amaltheidae; Pyritic specimen; Diameter 3.2 cm; Upper Pliensbachian, Lower Jurassic; Little Switzerland, Bavaria, Germany. own collection, therefore not geocoded.
Pleuroceras solare, Amaltheidae; Pyritic specimen; Diameter 3.2 cm; Upper Pliensbachian, Lower Jurassic; Little Switzerland, Bavaria, Germany. own collection, therefore not geocoded.
Euryapteryx gravis restored based on skeletons and preserved moa feathers.
A hypothetical life restoration of Ampelosaurus atacis • Ampelosaurus is known from hundreds of fossil specimens which show most of the dinosaur's osteological details, however, there are few articulated remains or reconstructions of the material so its overall proportions and life appearance are uncertain. • Ampelosaurus is known to have supported osteoderms, only four are currently known. The number of these osteoderms that an individual Ampelosaurus would have supported in life and their and position on the body is not currently known. It's thought that due to the rarity of titanosaur osteoderms that they would be quite sparse on the body. The position and layout of the osteoderms has been loosely based on this interpretation, which is based on the work of Vidal et al 2015. [1]
Lower Triassic fossil footprint (ichnite) of the ichnogenus Chirotherium, probably caused by an early archosaur, and first discovered 1833 in Hildburghausen (Thuringia, Germany). This specimen, however, ist from the Helsby Sandstone of the Storeton Quarry near Liverpool. Its species name is Chirotherium storetonense.[1]
Lower Triassic fossil footprint (ichnite) of the ichnogenus Chirotherium, probably caused by an early archosaur, and first discovered 1833 in Hildburghausen (Thuringia, Germany). This specimen, however, ist from the Helsby Sandstone of the Storeton Quarry near Liverpool. Its species name is Chirotherium storetonense.[1]
Lower Triassic fossil footprint (ichnite) of the ichnogenus Chirotherium, probably caused by an early archosaur, and first discovered 1833 in Hildburghausen (Thuringia, Germany). This specimen, however, ist from the Helsby Sandstone of the Storeton Quarry near Liverpool. Its species name is Chirotherium storetonense.[1]
Lower Triassic fossil footprint (ichnite) of the ichnogenus Chirotherium, probably caused by an early archosaur, and first discovered 1833 in Hildburghausen (Thuringia, Germany). This specimen, however, ist from the Helsby Sandstone of the Storeton Quarry near Liverpool. Its species name is Chirotherium storetonense.[1]
Lower Triassic fossil footprint (ichnite) of the ichnogenus Chirotherium, probably caused by an early archosaur, and first discovered 1833 in Hildburghausen (Thuringia, Germany). This specimen, however, ist from the Helsby Sandstone of the Storeton Quarry near Liverpool. Its species name is Chirotherium storetonense.[1]